Winning sng players, losing mtt players

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lary18thS

+1 for Balck Jck 1000% agree

btw. i have same profit diffrents about mtt and sng but for now make many times top 30 in sunday majors and thats mean nothing if you don't make top3 time to time ..... and prob 400 games it's nothing imo , so key here is really solid prob and then we can figurate how good or bad we are ..... btw i think is not possible to very good sng player be looseing mtt player..... "we" just need solid prob and then we make some(maby smaller) profit on mtt's ;)

---

of course its possible and has been proven many times over large, meaningful samples.

I think it is pretty easy to beat the $10 tourneys but beating the higher buy in games require different skills sets and deal with some better players.
If you compare mtts to chess at the $10 buy ins players are thinking 1 or 2 moves ahead, all most do is look at their cards.
This is why I easily beat the $10 games.

At higher buy ins many of the players are unimaginative like the $10 games, but their are more good players who will give you trouble and 3bet you light and if you fold a couple of times they will pick on you. Just because I can beat $75 45s does not mean I beat $75 mtts.

My winning 45 game does not equal my winning 90 man knockout game.

Also your flaws are more pronounced in mtts, if you make a bad play in a 45 it is not as big of a deal, you can still overcome it. But if you make a mistake late in an mtt that mistake could cost thousands of dollars or 100s of buy ins.