45 man SitnGo Study

Cambo - I did some work on my own results and I thought this might be interesting to analyze - I broke my games down into 4 consecutive chunks of 1000 games. Here are my overall stats after just having completed 4000 games:

http://img198.imageshack.us/img198/2...gamestotal.jpg

Now, it gets interesting when viewing them in chunks of 1000:

http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/6...hrough1000.jpg

http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/3...1001to2000.jpg

http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/4...hrough3000.jpg

http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/8...hrough4000.jpg


I have some thoughts on this but I am curious to hear yours (and anyone else's).

In other words, do you think I am doing something differently in my last 2000 games (only $5984.00 profit) from what I did in my first 2000 games ($13,750 Profit)?

Or is it just standard variance?

is it possible the betteer players are better playing you now? Your itm was 184 159 151 162.

The last 3 numbers seem more reliable for your graph.

I dont even have a thousand games at one level so my stats may not be conclusive but Ihave been consistant at each level.

Here is a cumulation of all my $75 x 45-player SNG results:

FT = 24%, ITM = 16%, W = 3.3%, 22% ROI over 1,586 games

And here are my monthly goals for 2010 in these:

25% ROI x 150 games = $2,813 profit

This data and a comparison to the $52 x 90-player SNGs can be found in my 2010 Poker/Personal Goals Thread.

I really need to re-subscribe to sharkscope cuz i have like 1500+ games at the 10+1 45ppl level.. Some i played tilted, some i played well, and i'd love to see my overall stats. If anyone would be so kind to post my finishing positions i'd be ever so greatful!!

:) thanks.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cambo71

is it possible the betteer players are better playing you now? Your itm was 184 159 151 162.

The last 3 numbers seem more reliable for your graph.

I dont even have a thousand games at one level so my stats may not be conclusive but Ihave been consistant at each level.

---

Yes, that is possible. The first thousand were played back before most people really knew how profitable these were, back in Dec 2007. It was me, Lappin, Rounder63, Muckmuckmcgup, weirdthing, and a few assorted regulars.

Now there are more sharks, which means the opposition is slightly better and there are fewer opportunities for me to grab chips from fish, because some of theo ther sharks have already grabbed them.

So, I probably play like a $4 to $5 per game player, which needs to change, because despite the problems I just mentioned, others still maintain mid 20 ROIs or better.

I thought my problem was all my middle game stack-offs. But looking at the charts, I ALWAYS had a ton of middle game stackoffs, the difference is, I used those midgame stackoffs to get a stack and exploit the final table, evidenced by the noticeable increase in the top prize positions.

But in the last three graphs, I still have the middle game stackoffs, but I am very flat in the top prize positions. I think that perhaps I tinkered too much with my end game in an effort to Increase my 30% ROI and instead ended up sabotaging my ROI. Who knows. Anything is possible. I also seem to have developed a disturbing trend of stacking off very early, whereas in the firs graph, I very rarely did.

What I want to know is this: If I look up my HEM stats for each 1000 game chunk, will they be nearly identical, or will there be noticeable similarities? I am talking about VPIP, PFR, aggression, positional awareness, CBet %, etc.

Unfortunately i cannot do this, because Hold Em manager SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!

The page that has these stats cannot be filtered by buy-in, field size, speed, etc. WHY IS THAT !???????????????

Like the graph. Did you get this info from Shark Scope,and one more question can you break this graph down by table instead of position

I keep my own retailed spreadsheet on excel. This is just a small sampling of the various stats I keep for my own use.

What do you mean "by table?"

What do you mean "by table?"[/QUOTE

For Example
20 Final Table Finishes
30 Final 2 Tables Finishes
50 Final 3 Table Finishes
60 Finishes with 4 tables left
70 Finishes with 5 tables left

Their may be a better way to explaine what Im trying to ask.So Im sorry if you have trouble understanding what im trying to ask.

h3r3ladototyhoottysootty $10 45 stats

Attachment 1925

games 1684
avg win $.70
roi 6.38%
cashes 301
itm% 17.87%
hu record 34-43
hu win% 44.2%
gamesperwin 49.53
bottom 15 22.00%
top 18 49.76%
top 15 42.16%
top 12 34.2%
FT 25.24%
4500 game index:
1st 90.86
2nd 114.90
3rd 125.59
4th 165.68
5th 144.30
6th 163.00

If you swaped your 3rd and 1st place finishes your roi would improve to over 13%

Pimpindonks $24 45 sng stats #1 45 man total profit

Attachment 1926

games 4261
avg win $4.71
roi 18.19%
cashes 715
itm% 16.78
hu record 143-91
hu win% 61.11%
games/win 29.8
bottom 15 19.53%
top 18 49.94%
top 15 42.08%
top 12 33.21%
FT 24.03
4500 game index:
1st 151.02
2nd 96.1
3rd 123.56
4th 123.56
5th 105.61
6th 155.25

pimpindonks $69

Attachment 1927

games 3554
avg win $23.33
roi 31.10%
cashes 629
itm% 17.7%
hu record 127-105
hu win% 54.74%
games/win 27.98
bottom15 18.80%
top 18 51.04%
top15 43.02%
top12 34.27%
FT 25.15%
4500 game index:
1st 160.8
2nd 132.95
3rd 145.61
4th 112.67
5th 122.82
6th 121.55

Even thought pimpdaddy here has less itm on the $75 his roi is better because of his higher index in the top 3.