Printable View
$75 45man
Games Played-637
ROI: 14%
Porf: $6,849
http://img340.imageshack.us/img340/7...gggggggggg.jpg http://img340.imageshack.us/img340/s...pg/1/w1000.png
and this is all only for 45man games :
http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/9...5manstatsb.jpg http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/a...jpg/1/w552.png
http://img705.imageshack.us/img705/3261/all45man.jpg http://img705.imageshack.us/img705/a...pg/1/w1000.png
Could you guys explain how you are going to use these studies game wise?
Dimitri. . . have you considered just paying someone to look over your hhs? Seems like you're putting in lots of time and work in ways that will yield at best nebulous info.
You can analyze stats all you want but it might take a good player ten minutes looking at your actual hhs to tell you: hey, you're shoving too loose in this spot, too light in this spot, and you're 3 betting is out of control (for example).
i'm not studing i just put my graphs to others.... thats allQuote:
Originally Posted by Vestvik7
Yes, I think this would be a good idea. Any volunteers?Quote:
Originally Posted by J4bberW0cky
I keep a notebook while I play that I used to mark hands for review later. I probably have 200 or 300 such hands. I have been meaning to mark them in HEM so that I can prepare them for some sort of review, either by myself or by someone else.
The problem is, after a session is over, I often just want to do something else. The last thing on my mind after staring at a screne clicking a button thousandsof times is to spend more tiem staring at ascreen clicking a button.
For me it is basically intellectual couriousity. But if your a break even or losing player you might identify the time of the game you need to work on. I think for most players it be realizing they need to work on the heads up game. I also want to see how important cashing is. It is probably more player dependent because of the person's win rate.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vestvik7
If you look at Dmitri's 4 graphs thought, it appears his first 1000 games he ran above expectation, it is far more lucky since the last 3 are much closer together.
Also if you look at someones graph and they are only making the final 18 about 45% or less they probably need to play tighter. This information can only be useful if the player in question is honest with himself.
If you look at H3R3 and his spread he needs to work on his final 6 game, he itm spread is too high for bottom 3, if he can make the spread more even he could probably grow his roi 15 to 20%. How he needs to make changes I can not say but his area of leaks is his in his final 6 players.
I do aggree with you Vestvik7 that this has limited scope and a players instinct or poker savy is more important than probably anything else and these graphs can not make one's poker savy better.
Yer right bout that cambo, and i have changed it drastically. I'll get these low stake 45s down eventually!
I played about 3000 games at 69+6$ 45man with 25-30% ROI. Unfortunately due to some shitty ftp workers I did it from different accounts, which all were blocked already and you all saw me at the tables.
But here are the sng finish positions of mine:
1 part:
2412 games
1. 3.4
2. 2.7
3. 2.9
4. 2.9
5. 2.2
6. 2.7
7. 2.9
8. 2.9
9. 2.7
2 part:
594 games
1. 4.7%
2. 2.7%
3. 4.2%
4. 2.4%
5. 2.5%
6. 2.6%
7. 3.7%
8. 2.8%
9. 3.3%