I'm curious what a good or average expected win rate should be for live cash per session. 100 BBs? 200? Less?
I'm curious what a good or average expected win rate should be for live cash per session. 100 BBs? 200? Less?
Any two cards...
I say 75 big blinds per 10 hour session in an unraked game if you crush it. I kinda pulled that from nowhere. I doubt there is any real data anywhere to figure it out
"It's Friday night and I'm spending it watching Cory grind a $26 7game tournament"
PM for coaching information
I normally try to keep my live cash game losses capped around 100 big blinds per hour when I play.![]()
Carbon Poker: ChiplessWonder
My real job: Nuclear thickness gauge sales & service
"You get what you put in, and people get what they deserve." - Kid Rock
My records have me at around 32/hour playing 1/2 for last year. I was around 42/hour until I took a huge nose dive in November, and I took the rest of the year off after that.
I personally think 25/hour at 1/2 is maintainable, running 4 hour sessions. Anymore and I generally start losing focus. So about 50 BB per session in my opinion.
HTH,
H
Yea this is the key. If you haven't been on a few 15BI+ downswings you haven't played enough hands to know your true winrate. Until that happens you are running really good.I was around 42/hour until I took a huge nose dive in November
For how many hands I've played online and what I've read about this subject I really want to say 20bbs/100hands is the absolute best you can do. This could turn into 30bbs/100 depending on your style since live games are unraked. This would equal $14/hour at 1-2 and $21/hour at 1-3.
But live play is wierd. I've heard stories from people I trust about a guy named stan going to vegas and winning 70 buyins in 1 month playing 5/10. From everything I know I have a hard time believing it but the multiple people said they witnessed it.
My guess is that winrates can skyrocket when you are constantly 500bbs 1000bbs or more deep with everybody.
So who knows what's possible.
"It's Friday night and I'm spending it watching Cory grind a $26 7game tournament"
PM for coaching information
If that's the Stan from Gemini, he could do that for sure. He is very good.
I guess anywhere from 50-75BB is good, while 100+ is very good.
Thanks for the input guys. If anyone else has some, feel free to add it.![]()
Any two cards...
The reason I have a hard time believing it is because I played with stan once before. I could see how he plays and how he could definitely destroy level 1 thinkers at gemini, but I wasn't THAT impressed.
Add to that the unbelievable part is that 1 months is not much more than 6k hands if you really grind. I couldn't make 70bis playing 1cent 2cent over that many hands. So there must be something I'm missing if his results are that good consistently. The game being uncapped and maybe getting some lucky donations is the only thing that can really account for that.
Last edited by ThrillCory90; 01-12-2010 at 12:53 PM.
"It's Friday night and I'm spending it watching Cory grind a $26 7game tournament"
PM for coaching information
Sure, one month isn't very long, but if you catch a heater at the right time, I think it could happen.
Any two cards...
Never Complain. Never Explain.
Don't forget that the 5-10 is uncapped ... so what constitutes a buy-in? I heard the same stories ...and I don't doubt that the people who told me were telling the truth (as they heard it). Could be true, could be exaggerated, could be a little of both.
I also sat next to a guy in Vegas at a 2-5 game who told me one night he ran hot at 2-5 so he sat with 1k at 5-10 (Bellagio), ran hot and went to 10-20. Hit a few monsters and went to a 25-50 game where he ended up winning
50k in one night.
Stan's story is possible ... I just don't think it's sustainable.
Bookmarks